FAQ: Targeting CISOs vs. Practitioners in Cybersecurity Marketing Campaigns

Executing successful marketing campaigns in the cybersecurity space requires a nuanced understanding of its diverse audiences. The strategies that capture the attention of a Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) are often different from those that resonate with a hands-on security practitioner. While CISOs are focused on strategic risk, business outcomes, and team capabilities, practitioners are typically more engaged by technical solutions and skill development. This FAQ article synthesizes practical advice and strategies for effectively segmenting, targeting, and messaging these distinct personas. It covers everything from leveraging LinkedIn's advanced targeting features and structuring campaigns to developing compelling content and measuring success beyond simple conversions.

What kind of content and messaging resonates best with CISOs versus hands-on practitioners?

For CISOs: Strategic & Business-Oriented Content

Content for CISOs should address their high-level responsibilities, such as strategic planning, risk management, and organizational readiness. They respond well to assets that provide a clear framework for action and demonstrate business value. Examples of effective content include:

  • Strategic Guides: An asset like a "CISO Action Plan" for a specific industry (e.g., finance) is highly effective. The messaging should acknowledge their specific struggles and the threats their organization faces.
  • Benchmark Reports: These reports are considered a strong lead magnet for CISOs, as they provide data-driven insights into industry trends and performance, helping them gauge their own organization's maturity.
  • Business Outcome Messaging: Messaging should focus on solving broad business problems. For instance, instead of focusing on a single tool, a message like "you're only using part of the platform, but there's so much more you can unlock" speaks to the CISO's goal of maximizing ROI and achieving a holistic security posture.

For Practitioners: Technical & Skills-Focused Content

Practitioners, such as security engineers and analysts, are more engaged by content that addresses specific technical challenges and helps them improve their skills. Their focus is on the "how-to" rather than the "why." Effective content includes:

  • Threat-Specific Lead Magnets: Ebooks, white papers, and webinars that dive into specific, relevant threats like GenAI bot attacks or the Scattered Spider ransomware group are highly relevant.
  • Product-Specific Information: Content detailing the capabilities of tools like cyber ranges, crisis simulations, or security labs directly appeals to their need for practical solutions.
  • Training-Oriented Keywords: Search campaigns targeting terms like "cybersecurity awareness training" can effectively capture practitioner intent, though care must be taken to filter out students and individual learners.

How should our ad copy and imagery change when we're targeting a CISO?

Ad Copy: Personalized and Strategic

When targeting CISOs, ad copy should be personalized and speak to their strategic concerns. Leveraging features in LinkedIn's beta program allows for dynamically inserting a person's job title and company name, making the ad feel more direct. An effective formula is to acknowledge their role and a common pain point, such as: "We know that [Job Title]s like you are struggling with [specific challenge]. As companies like [Company Name] become targets, here's a guide to help you prepare." This approach validates their challenges and offers a high-value solution. It's also critical to keep headlines concise and impactful. Analysis shows that long headlines lead to wasted clicks on "read more," so the core value proposition should be immediately visible.

Imagery: Professional and Story-Driven

While the sources don't specify a visual style for CISOs, the recommendation for explaining complex, platform-level concepts is to use video over static images. A short, professionally produced video can tell a richer story about business outcomes and the holistic value of a solution, which is more likely to capture a CISO's attention than a single, feature-focused image. The goal of the visual is not to explain every detail but to provide a compelling overview that entices the viewer to click through to a landing page for more information. For static images, the focus should be on conveying professionalism, trust, and strategic value rather than using generic stock photos or overly technical diagrams.

Are job titles and seniority the most effective way to segment these two audiences on LinkedIn?

Job titles and seniority are the foundational and most commonly used methods for segmenting CISOs and practitioners on LinkedIn, but they are not the only effective way. A more sophisticated and effective approach involves layering these demographic filters with behavioral and skill-based targeting.

Advanced Targeting Layers:

  • LinkedIn Custom Segments: These are powerful, pre-built audiences based on user behavior. The "IT Committee" segment, for example, is a behavioral cohort of IT decision-makers. Layering this segment on top of a seniority filter (e.g., Director and above) and a target account list can precisely reach the entire buying committee within key organizations. However, these broad behavioral segments are best suited for wider campaigns rather than narrow, account-based marketing (ABM) lists where they may be less effective.
  • Member Skills: Targeting based on skills listed on member profiles is another effective strategy. LinkedIn can provide a "Member Skills Index" report, which identifies the skills that are over-indexing with your current campaign audiences. This allows you to find relevant users based on their stated expertise (e.g., "Threat Intelligence," "Incident Response"), which can be a stronger signal of their role and interests than a job title alone.
  • Member Groups: Testing ad delivery to members of specific, relevant LinkedIn groups is another tactic. While the source materials did not name specific groups, this method allows you to reach audiences who have self-selected into communities focused on topics like information security, cloud security, or cyber forensics.

In summary, while job titles and seniority are a necessary starting point, the most effective strategy combines them with behavioral segments like the "IT Committee" and skill-based targeting to improve audience quality and campaign relevance.

Can we use different lead magnets for CISOs and practitioners within the same campaign?

While it is technically possible to use different lead magnets for CISOs and practitioners within the same campaign by using separate ad groups, the prevailing advice from the provided sources suggests this may not be the most effective strategy. The primary concern is maintaining a sufficient audience size for each ad group to run effectively on platforms like LinkedIn.

Key Considerations:

  • Audience Size: Hyper-segmenting an audience within a single campaign can result in ad groups that are too small to deliver properly. If the distinct persona-based audiences (e.g., CISOs at companies with over 1000 employees vs. practitioners in the same segment) are not large enough on their own, the campaign's reach and performance will suffer.
  • Campaign Control and Clarity: The recommended best practice, particularly for Google Ads and for distinct strategic initiatives on LinkedIn, is to create separate campaigns. This allows for better budget control, clearer messaging, and more accurate performance tracking for each persona and goal. For example, a campaign for a "CISO Action Plan" would have different KPIs and budget considerations than a campaign for a technical white paper aimed at practitioners.
  • Platform Differences: On Google Ads, separating campaigns by persona or intent is critical to manage budget allocation across different regions and time zones. On LinkedIn, while it's possible to combine audiences, the algorithm may favor one ad group over another, making it difficult to ensure equitable delivery to both CISOs and practitioners.

Therefore, the recommended approach is to create separate campaigns for each persona, especially when the strategic goals, messaging, and lead magnets are significantly different. This ensures that each audience receives a tailored experience and that you can accurately measure the effectiveness of your strategy for each group.

What are the key business pain points for a CISO that we must address in our ads?

Ads targeting CISOs must speak directly to their strategic challenges and business-level responsibilities. Based on campaign strategy discussions, several key pain points have been identified as highly resonant for this audience.

Primary CISO Pain Points:

  • Organizational Readiness and Threat Preparedness: CISOs are constantly concerned with their organization's ability to withstand an attack. Messaging that addresses this directly, such as offering a guide to "help you be ready before an attack strikes," is effective. This pain point is particularly acute when tied to specific, prevalent threats like the Scattered Spider ransomware group or attacks leveraging generative AI.
  • Managing a Siloed and Complex Toolset: Many security leaders struggle with a fragmented collection of security tools. A key pain point is the lack of a unified platform that provides a holistic view of their security posture. Messaging that highlights the limitations of using only one part of a solution and promotes the value of an integrated platform—phrased as "unlocking more" from their investment—directly addresses this challenge.
  • Strategic Planning and Risk Mitigation: CISOs operate at a strategic level and are looking for frameworks and actionable plans. Content like a "CISO Action Plan" or an industry benchmark report addresses their need to make informed, data-driven decisions and to align their security programs with business objectives. Ad copy should acknowledge their title and the specific pressures they face in managing risk for their company and industry.
  • Team Capabilities and Skills Gaps: A CISO's success depends on their team's ability to execute. Content related to testing and measuring team experience, developing cyber capabilities, and tracking skills with detailed reporting speaks to their responsibility for building and maintaining a resilient security organization.

How do we build an effective lookalike audience for CISOs on LinkedIn?

Building an effective lookalike audience on LinkedIn to target CISOs requires starting with a high-quality, relevant source list. The strategy is to identify a group of known individuals who closely match your ideal CISO persona and use that list as the seed for LinkedIn's algorithm to find similar professionals.

A Practical Approach:

  1. Select a High-Quality Source Audience: The most effective method discussed is to use a list of engaged, high-intent individuals. For example, you can upload a list of past webinar registrants, particularly from a webinar that was targeted at a senior, strategic audience. This ensures the source list is composed of people who have already shown interest in your content and likely fit the target demographic.
  2. Consider the Campaign Goal: This technique is best suited for campaigns with a somewhat broad appeal, such as a general-interest webinar or a thought leadership piece. If your goal is to target an extremely niche segment (e.g., CISOs in a specific sub-industry), a lookalike audience may become too broad and pull in users who are outside your ideal customer profile (ICP).
  3. Launch and Monitor: Once the lookalike audience is created in LinkedIn Campaign Manager, launch the campaign and pay close attention to the demographics of the members who engage with your ads. Continuously monitor the job titles, industries, and seniority levels of the leads coming through to ensure they align with your CISO persona.
  4. Refine as Needed: If you find the audience is too broad, you can refine it by adding additional targeting layers, such as seniority (Director level and above) or specific company industries, to the campaign. This helps focus the lookalike audience on the most relevant segment.

The key is to start with the best possible seed list, as the quality of the lookalike audience is directly dependent on the quality of the source data.

Is it better to have separate campaigns for each persona or just use different ad groups?

The consensus from internal strategy discussions strongly favors using separate campaigns for different personas, particularly when the strategy, budget, and goals are distinct. While using different ad groups within a single campaign is an option, it presents several challenges that often make it the less effective choice.

Reasons to Use Separate Campaigns:

  • Budget Control and Allocation: Separate campaigns provide granular control over your budget. On Google Ads, for instance, a single campaign budget can be disproportionately spent in one region (like the US) due to higher search volume, leaving little for others. Separating campaigns by region, and by extension persona, ensures each segment receives its dedicated budget.
  • Audience Size and Delivery: On LinkedIn, if you segment too much within one campaign, individual ad groups may have audiences that are too small for effective delivery. This can stifle reach and prevent your ads from being shown to valuable prospects. A dedicated campaign for each persona ensures the audience is substantial enough to run optimally.
  • Clear Messaging and Testing: Personas like CISOs and practitioners require different messaging, creative, and offers. Housing them in separate campaigns prevents message dilution and allows for cleaner A/B testing and performance analysis. You can tailor every element, from ad copy to landing page, specifically to that persona's pain points.
  • Accurate Performance Tracking: With separate campaigns, it is much easier to measure what is and isn't working for each persona. You can clearly see the cost-per-lead (CPL), conversion rate, and overall ROI for your CISO-targeted efforts versus your practitioner-targeted efforts, allowing for more informed strategic decisions.

In conclusion, while ad groups can be used for minor variations, creating separate campaigns for distinct personas like CISOs and practitioners is the recommended best practice for achieving better control, clarity, and performance.

What LinkedIn groups are CISOs and security directors most active in?

While internal discussions confirmed a strategy to test targeting based on member groups, specific group names were not mentioned. However, based on external research of the LinkedIn ecosystem, several prominent groups are popular among CISOs, security directors, and other senior cybersecurity professionals. These communities are valuable for networking, sharing knowledge, and staying current on industry trends.

Prominent LinkedIn Groups for Security Leaders:

  • Information Security Community: As one of the largest groups on LinkedIn with nearly 400,000 members, this community is a major hub for professionals at all levels, including many senior leaders. Topics are broad, covering compliance, cloud security, data protection, and more.
  • CISO Cyber Security Information Group (CSIG): This group is specifically geared towards security managers and CISOs. With over 18,000 members, it facilitates discussions and knowledge sharing on issues directly affecting senior security leadership.
  • Cloud Security Alliance (CSA): With over 90,000 members, this group is less about general networking and more focused on establishing and promoting best practices in cloud security. It attracts senior professionals who are responsible for their organization's cloud strategy and security.
  • Information Security Network: This large group of over 570,000 members is a primary destination for security professionals to network and discuss a wide range of topics. Its sheer size ensures a significant presence of senior members and decision-makers.
  • Advanced Persistent Threats (APT) & Cyber Security: A more specialized group with over 100,000 members, it focuses on advanced topics like threat intelligence, risk management, and incident response, which are highly relevant to the strategic concerns of CISOs and directors.

When using group targeting, it's important to layer it with other filters like seniority (Director+) and relevant job functions to ensure you are reaching the decision-makers within these large communities.

Should our messaging focus on technical features for practitioners and business outcomes or compliance for CISOs?

For CISOs: Focus on Business Outcomes, Risk, and Strategy

Yes, messaging for CISOs should absolutely center on business outcomes and strategic concerns, not granular technical features. CISOs are responsible for aligning security initiatives with business goals and managing overall risk. Your messaging must reflect these priorities.

  • Address Business Risk: Use copy that acknowledges the threats their specific company and industry face. For example, a campaign for a financial services CISO could reference the risk of targeted cyber attacks in their sector.
  • Highlight Strategic Value: Frame your solution in terms of strategic advantage. This could be achieving a more holistic security posture, maximizing the ROI of their technology stack, or enabling the business to innovate securely. The "Immersive One Platform" messaging is a prime example of this, focusing on unlocking more value rather than on individual product features.
  • Provide Actionable Frameworks: CISOs respond to content that helps them plan and execute. Lead magnets like a "CISO Action Plan" or a benchmark report are effective because they provide a strategic framework, not just a technical tool.

For Practitioners: Focus on Technical Solutions and Skills

Practitioners are the hands-on implementers. Their primary focus is on solving technical problems and improving their own capabilities. Therefore, your messaging to them should be more direct and feature-oriented.

  • Solve a Specific Problem: Messaging should be tied to a concrete technical challenge or threat. A campaign for a "Scattered Spider exercise" or a white paper on defending against GenAI bots speaks directly to the problems they face daily.
  • Emphasize Tools and Capabilities: Highlight specific tools and what they can do. Keywords like "cyber ranges," "crisis simulations," and "cybersecurity awareness training" are effective because they correspond directly to the solutions practitioners are searching for.

How can we use thought leadership content to engage senior security executives without being too salesy?

Engaging senior security executives with thought leadership requires a value-first approach that prioritizes education and strategic insight over an immediate sales pitch. The goal is to build trust and brand recognition by being a helpful authority in the space.

Key Strategies:

  1. Lead with High-Value, Gated Content: Offer substantial, insightful content that addresses the strategic challenges of a CISO. Examples that have been identified as effective include a comprehensive "CISO Action Plan" guide or an exclusive industry benchmark report. These assets position your brand as a knowledgeable partner.
  2. Adopt a Nurture-Focused Mindset: Recognize that the sales cycle for a senior executive is long. The initial engagement should not be to secure a demo, but to capture their information and enter them into a nurture sequence. This involves creating a "full omnichannel approach" where paid ads are aligned with follow-up email sequences, gradually building familiarity and trust. The objective is to "keep our brand in their face" in a helpful way, not to force a conversion.
  3. Soften the Call-to-Action (CTA): A hard CTA like "Request a Demo" is often perceived as too high-commitment for an initial interaction. It can deter executives who are simply seeking information. Instead, use softer CTAs that lower the barrier to engagement. For existing customers, a "Talk to your CSM" CTA is effective for expansion plays. For new prospects, a more general "Contact Us" or "Learn More" can be more approachable than demanding a sales call.
  4. Measure Broader Success Metrics: Don't judge the success of a thought leadership campaign solely on demo requests. Track "micro-conversions" such as time on site, visits to other key pages (like the homepage or product pages), and content downloads. These metrics prove that your content is engaging and that you are successfully building awareness and stickiness with your target audience, even if they don't convert immediately.

What's a good click-through rate (CTR) to expect for a CISO-targeted campaign?

While internal discussions highlight the need to improve CTR, specific benchmarks for CISO-targeted campaigns were not provided. However, by looking at general LinkedIn advertising benchmarks, we can establish a reasonable expectation.

Targeting senior decision-makers like CISOs is inherently more difficult and often results in a lower CTR than broader campaigns. The audience is more selective and less likely to click on ads that aren't highly relevant to their strategic priorities. That said, a well-executed campaign can still achieve solid performance.

General LinkedIn CTR Benchmarks:

  • Sponsored Content (Overall): The average CTR for standard sponsored content (like single image or video ads) on LinkedIn is generally between 0.44% and 0.65%. For a highly specific and senior audience like CISOs, a CTR at the lower end of this range or slightly below would be understandable, while anything exceeding 0.50% could be considered good.
  • Message Ads: These ads, which are delivered directly to a user's LinkedIn inbox, have a different set of metrics. A typical open rate is around 38%, with a CTR (clicks on the link within the message) of about 3.6%. An internal campaign saw a high 48% open rate but a low CTR, indicating the message subject was compelling but the content or offer was not.
  • Document Ads: This format, which allows users to download a document directly from the ad, has an average CTR of around 0.43%.

For a CISO-targeted campaign, aiming for a CTR around 0.40% - 0.50% for sponsored content is a realistic starting point. If your CTR is significantly below this, it's a strong indicator that you need to refresh your creative, refine your ad copy, or revisit your audience targeting to ensure maximum relevance.

We're finding our CISO-targeted campaigns are very expensive. How can we improve efficiency?

High costs are a common challenge when targeting a premium audience like CISOs. Improving efficiency requires a multi-faceted approach focused on precision, relevance, and a smarter conversion strategy.

Strategies to Improve Cost-Efficiency:

  • Adopt a Full-Funnel Nurture Strategy: Instead of paying a premium to drive every user to a high-cost, bottom-of-funnel action like "Request a Demo," shift your focus. Use less expensive, top-of-funnel lead magnets (e.g., white papers, ebooks) to capture interest and build a remarketing audience. This allows you to engage a wider audience at a lower initial cost and then use targeted nurture campaigns to guide the most interested prospects toward a sales conversation.
  • Use More Efficient Ad Formats: LinkedIn Document Ads with native Lead Gen Forms are identified as a top-performing format. They capture lead information directly within the LinkedIn platform, which typically results in a higher conversion rate and lower cost-per-lead (CPL) compared to driving traffic to an external landing page.
  • Refine Your Targeting with Behavioral Data: Move beyond broad job title targeting. Use LinkedIn's advanced features like Custom Segments (e.g., the "IT Committee" behavioral audience) and Member Skills targeting. Layering these behavioral signals on top of seniority and company size filters ensures your expensive impressions are served to the most relevant audience possible.
  • Optimize Ad Copy and Creative: Small tweaks can have a big impact on cost. A/B test personalized ad copy that dynamically includes the user's job title or company name. Keep headlines short and impactful to avoid wasted clicks on "read more." For complex topics, use short, engaging videos, which can tell a richer story and better qualify clicks than a static image.
  • Track Micro-Conversions: For awareness-focused campaigns, don't measure success solely on expensive direct conversions. Track "micro-conversions" like visits to the homepage, time on site, or multiple pages viewed. This provides a more holistic view of engagement and helps justify the spend by demonstrating the ad's influence on the customer journey.

Are VPs of Security considered part of the CISO persona or the practitioner persona in our campaigns?

In the context of campaign strategy and persona mapping, a VP of Security should be considered part of the CISO persona. While the title "VP of Security" is not explicitly mentioned in the provided knowledge sources, the role's responsibilities and position within an organization align squarely with the senior, strategic audience being targeted.

Rationale for Grouping with the CISO Persona:

  • Senior Leadership Role: A Vice President of Security is a senior leadership position. They are key decision-makers, often reporting directly to the CISO, CIO, or, in some organizations, acting as the highest-ranking security executive themselves.
  • Strategic Focus: Like a CISO, a VP of Security is concerned with business-level outcomes, risk management, compliance, and overall security program strategy. Their pain points revolve around organizational readiness, budget allocation, and demonstrating security's value to the business—not just day-to-day technical implementation.
  • Part of the Buying Committee: The transcripts repeatedly reference targeting the "IT committee" or "C-level audience." A VP of Security is a core member of this buying committee and has significant influence and authority over purchasing decisions for security technology and services.

In contrast, the practitioner persona is described with titles like "engineers" and is targeted with more hands-on, technical content related to specific tools and skills. A VP of Security has moved beyond this tactical focus. Therefore, all messaging, content, and offers designed for the CISO persona would be equally relevant and appropriate for a VP of Security.

How can we leverage employee profiles to build credibility with senior security leaders?

The provided knowledge sources do not contain information or discussions related to leveraging employee profiles for marketing or credibility-building purposes. The strategic conversations are focused exclusively on executing paid media campaigns through official company channels on platforms like LinkedIn and Google Ads.

There is no mention of strategies such as:

  • Employee advocacy programs.
  • Using executives' personal LinkedIn profiles to share content.
  • Featuring employee stories or expertise in ad campaigns.

The discussions on building credibility center on using high-quality, authoritative thought leadership content (like benchmark reports and strategic guides) and running highly targeted, personalized ad campaigns. While leveraging employee profiles is a valid and often effective marketing strategy for building trust, it is not a tactic that has been covered in the available materials.